Editorial
by Rob Davies
The PULMAN Policy
Conference
by Margo de Groot
The PULMAN Conference:
the programme
The PULMAN Conference
Manifesto
Trends and forecasts
By Rob Davies
Public Libraries in
Europe:
by David Fuegi
& Martin Jennings
PULMAN: an overview
The PULMAN Thematic Network is being
funded under the European Commission’s IST FP5 programme from May 2001 to May
2003. It has undertaken a variety of activities intended to help strengthen the
performance and achieve the potential of public libraries in new economic,
social and cultural roles. Its main goals have been to promote a Europe-wide
exchange of knowledge, experience and good practice within and between the
policymaking and professional communities responsible for public libraries in
26 member states and candidate countries and - through the PULMAN-XT extension
project – a further 10 neighbouring countries. In the process, we hope to have
achieved wide-ranging and high-impact promotion of digital services and best
practice centres throughout the continent.
PULMAN started from a public library perspective. But
from this position, the development of cross-domain and cross-sectoral agendas
for local services have been among the foremost issues we have tried to
address. In particular, the way in which public libraries interact and
co-operate with their sibling local cultural institutions, archives and museums
have been at the heart of a number of PULMAN activities, in particular the
national workshops.
Our agenda has been guided strongly by the
priorities for e-Europe 2005, including the drive for modern public services in
areas such as e-government, e-learning and e-health, the need for greater
interactivity in services for the citizen, the need to exploit broadband
infrastructure and the growing range of potential platforms (e.g. mobile,
Digital TV) for service delivery. Above all by the need to ensure e-inclusion -
‘an Information Society for All’ – by attending to the needs of all citizens
for digital skills and lifelong learning, including those with special needs
and those living in Europe’s more remote areas.
Public libraries are already developing a
formidable track record as the leading Public Internet Access Point (PIAP) in
many countries. The next stage is to
build on this by developing more local digital content -and applications- and
by integrating them into a growing range of well-designed services which meet
real user needs.
The main activities of PULMAN have included:
The compilation of Guidelines on digital
services and their translation into over 20 languages. The Guidelines are in three broad
categories: social policy, management and technical and are further subdivided
into individual topics. Such was the interest created by the PULMAN Guidelines
that we have now produced a Second Edition with updated information, many more
links illustrating good practice and modifications which take into account the
many comments received. The Introduction and Summaries to the Second Edition
can be found in the last section of this brochure. The full text in English,
with all the new links, is now available on PULMANWeb.
A National Workshop has been organized in every
country in order to launch the original Guidelines, to discuss strategies for public
libraries and to develop consensus on co-operation between libraries, museums
and archives at local level. These workshops have been attended by over 2500
leading professionals and policy makers including many from the archives and
museums communities. In many cases the conclusions reached and actions planned
are proving to be an important catalyst for new developments. Some of these are
described in Section 7 – Country Highlights. The main findings of the workshops
are summarised within Section 6 below. Other consensus-building work between
the libraries, museums and archives communities has included a European-level
workshop held in The Hague during June 2002, involving many of the leading
European representative associations from these domains.
A Country Report on public libraries, covering issues
such as organisational structure, strategic development, use of technology and
standards has been compiled for every country as an aid to benchmarking. We are
very pleased to note that the majority of these have been updated recently by
integrating the unique data obtained through the NAPLE survey on The Public
Library in the Electronic World (see Section 6). PULMANWeb also gives access to
details of key contacts and links to other important documents and information
in each country.
There have been many other PULMAN initiatives: more
than 70 managers from public libraries in the South and East of Europe have
attended specially customised training attachments in some of the best public
libraries in Europe in Denmark, Finland, Greece and Slovenia. A registry of
distance professional learning materials has been made available through
PULMANWeb.
All the news, information and services produced by
PULMAN have been made available via PULMANWeb our content-rich website
www.pulmanweb.org and through our e-Newsletter PULMANEXpress, both operated by
our Greek partner.
It would be impossible to complete this brief overview
of PULMAN without paying tribute to the work of the network of Country
Co-ordinators. They have been responsible for the high output achieved from the
project through a wide range of responsibilities, including bringing together
‘support groups’, organising translations of the Guidelines and national
workshops, supplying country information and generally promoting the work of
PULMAN. Whatever has been achieved in each country is a testimony to their
work.
The key PULMAN event is undoubtedly this Conference to
which have been invited senior policy makers and practitioners from every
country in the PULMAN Network. The planned outcome of the conference is a
Manifesto which we hope will act as a beacon in the development of strategies
for local services provided by public libraries, museums and archives over the
next few years
By Rob Davies
MDR Partners
Email: rob.davies@mdrpartners.com
g
Introduction
The PULMAN policy conference:
Public libraries, museums and archives learning from each other in e-Europe was
held at Tagus Park, Oeiras, Portugal, on 13-14 March 2003. The conference
hosted nearly 200 guests from 41 countries, including China, Armenia, Iceland,
Cyprus, Russia and Turkey. The conference was the culmination point of the
PULMAN project.
Judging by the comments, the
conference was a true success. “A
thoroughly inspiring conference," was one reaction, and "a landmark
conference in the development of public libraries." Moreover the conference proved to be especially
important in establishing links between EU participants and the great number of
representatives from the accession and other countries. Erkki Liikanen, European Commissioner for the Information Society, saw
the PULMAN policy conference as a key event for public libraries in Europe,
setting the scene for exciting developments in the years to come.
The PULMAN policy
conference
Chaired
by PULMAN project coordinator and director of Antwerp public libraries Mr. Jan van
Vaerenbergh, the conference was officially opened by His Excellency the
Portuguese Minister for Culture, Mr. Pedro Roseta. Dr. Kyriaki Manesi as
official representative of His Excellency the Greek Minister for Culture
welcomed the participants and briefly outlined the situation of public
libraries in Greece, the country that held the presidency of the European
Commission at the time of the conference. Mrs. Zambujo, the Major of Oeiras
welcomed the guests on behalf of the Municipality. Mr. Erkki Liikanen, European
Commissioner for Enterprise and the Information Society, per video message
impressed the vital role of public libraries and their local counterparts upon
the participants.
The current state of digital service development in
the cultural heritage sector and specifically in libraries across Europe was
introduced by Jens Thorhauge and Tiiu Valm. Both speakers pointed out that the
development of digital policies and practices is very uneven from country to
country as is the case with traditional library services. The PULMAN project
has from this perspective been a successful platform for exchanging knowledge
and valuable experience on how to provide information to users with access to
extended sources of information on business, education, leisure etc. However,
there is an articulated need for concerted European and national efforts to
pave the way for networking the libraries of Europe. Rob Davies, PULMAN project
manager, outlined how many people the PULMAN project has reached and came to a
total of well over 170.000!
The four workshops with the themes e-government,
social and economic development, lifelong learning and cultural diversity
formed the cornerstone of the conference. In each workshop three inspiring
casestudies were presented. The casestudies represented an equal mix of
geographical spreading, small and large budgets etc. The one common denominator
was that all projects, be it Seamless UK or Learning Exchange from Slovenia,
have made a substantial contribution to the realization of the information
society and the role of public libraries in this society.
Across all
workshops valuable lessons were learnt about the role of public libraries and
their partners in the information society:

Public libraries are well placed to bridge the digital divide and to contribute
to mutual learning;
Also public libraries are in a central position
to work well with other parties at the local level to help create and provide
access to cultural resources;
Or, as one of the assessors encouraged the
audience:
The introduction from the European Commission
on the road ahead for public libraries and memory institutions allowed the participants
to start thinking about the opportunities that the 6th framework
programme offers for further research and development.
The
highlight of the conference was the issuing of the Oeiras Manifesto: The PULMAN
agenda for e-Europe. The Manifesto was introduced by Chris Batt, Director of
the Libraries and Information Society Team of Resource: the Council for Public
Libraries, Museums and Archives. He summarized the conference by saying that
public libraries should aim to be “a cocktail of the traditional and the new, a
bag that contains the whole new world to which everyone has access, a forum for
anyone to talk to anyone and an engine of democracy.”
Oeiras Manifesto
The PULMAN policy conference
on behalf of all participants issued the Oeiras Manifesto: the PULMAN agenda
for e-Europe. This Manifesto underlines the vital role of public libraries in
meeting the objectives of the e-Europe action plan by accelerating their
development as centers of access to digital resources and by developing
services to meet the needs of all citizens in the information society. In
short: the Oeiras Manifesto outlines to road to an e-Europe for all. The Manifesto states that the participants in
the PULMAN conference agree that citizens will benefit substantially through coherent
support for public library, archive and museum services at local, national and
European level in four specific areas, that are the cornerstones of the
information society: Democracy and Citizenship (e-government), Lifelong
Learning, Economic and Social Development and Cultural Diversity. The Oeiras Manifesto will be disseminated widely through the PULMAN
network of country coordinators and conference participants.
Or, in PULMAN terms: we call
on the human network of librarians, museologists, archivists, information
professionals and politicians to:
Judging by the many
congratulations that the organizing team received, it can be concluded that the
PULMAN conference and the project can feature in years to come as an inspiring
story of success in the field of political achievements, cross cultural
cooperation, cross domain innovation and human networks.
By
Margo de Groot
EBLIDA, Netherlands
Email: pulman@nblc.nl
http://www.eblida.org
g
13
March 2003
13.00 – 14.00 Registration with coffee and
tea
14.00 – 14.05 Welcome by PULMAN project team
Speaker: Jan van Vaerenbergh,
PULMAN co-ordinator and conference chair, Director of Antwerp Public Libraries
14.05 – 14.15 Welcome by His Excellency the
Portuguese Minister of Culture, Pedro Roseta
14.15 – 14.25 Developments in Greek public libraries,
museums and archives by Dr Dafni Kiriaki Manesi, Special Secretary of
Libraries, Arhives and Educational Television, representing His Excellency the
Greek Minister of Education and Religious Affairs
14.25 – 14.30 Welcome by Her Excellency the Major of
Oeiras Municipality Teresa Pais Zambujo
14.30 – 14.40 Delivering e-Europe at the local level
by Erkki. Liikanen, European Commissioner for the Information Society (video
presentation)
14.40 – 15.00 Library policies for the digital era
Jens Thorhauge, Director General of the Danish National
Library Authority
15.00 – 15.20 Through the PULMAN glass: looking back
at the future of public libraries, museums and archives
Tiiu Valm,
Director General, National Library of Estonia
15.20 – 15.30 PULMAN: the project results
Rob Davies,
PULMAN project manager, partner in MDR Partners
15.30 – 16.00 Break and going to the workshops
16.00 – 18.00 Workshops
Workshop 1 Democracy and citizenship (e-government) |
Chair: Ana Maria Runkel, Director of Libraries
and Archives Department, Lisbon Municipality, Portugal
Assessor: Deirdre Ellis
King, Director Dublin City Library, Ireland
Case studies:
Seamless UK – Mary Rowlatt,
Strategic Information Manager, Essex County Libraries, United Kingdom
Growing up in a library:
team work leading to personal autonomy – Verena Tibljas, Manager,
Rijeka City Library, Croatia
Information Gas Station – Jouni
Juntumaa, project manager Helsinki City Library, Finland
|
Workshop 2 Economic and social development |
Chair:Rolf Hapel,
Director, Aarhus Public Libraries, Denmark
Assessor: Andreas
Mittrowan, project manager, Bertelsmann Stiftung, Germany
Case studies:
Finfo – Lotte Duwe
Nielsen, project manager, Aarhus Public Libraries, Denmark
BEASTS – Ellen Rhys,
Director, Wales Digital College, UK
Informar – María Auxiliadora González Sánchez, project manager, Fundación German
Sánchez Ruipérez, Spain
|
Workshop 3 Lifelong learning |
Chair: Barbara Lison,
Director Bremen Public Library, Germany
Assessor: Audrone
Glosiene, Director
of the Institute of library and Information Science at Vilnius University, Lithuania
Case studies:
Learning exchange Slovenia – Marijan
Spoljar, Ljubljana Public Library, Slovenia
ABSIDE and EQUAL – Pier Giacomo
Sola, President of AMITIE, Italy and Mr. David Fuegi, partner, MDR Partners
ECDL – Paulo Leităo, Director of the
Municipal Library of Almada, Portugal
|
Workshop 4
Cultural diversity |
Chair: Jasmina Ninkov, Director, Municipal
Public Library M. Bojic, Serbia
Assessor: Costis Dallas, Chairman and Senior
Researcher of Critical Publics SA, Greece
Case studies:
Digital Heritage The
Netherlands – Janneke van Kersen, projectmanager Digital Heritage The Netherlands,
The Netherlands
COINE – Nuria Ferran,
Open Univeristy of Catalonia, Spain/United Kingdom
ACTIVATE – Norma
McDermott, Director, The Library Council, Ireland
18.00 – 18.15 Group
picture on the stairs outside Tagus Park
18.15 – 18.30 Transport
with buses to the hotels
20.00 Buses leave hotels for dinner
|
20.30 – 23.30 Dinner and launch of the PULMAN
cultural cocktail designed by prime cocktail designer and flair tender Mr.
Fernando Castellon from BarExpertise in France! |
14 March 2003
9.00
– 10.00 Welcome with
coffee and tea
10.00
– 11.30 Lessons learned
Assessors from
the workshops
11.30
– 12.00 The road map for
e-Europe: how to proceed form here
Bernard Smith, Head Preservation
and Enhancement of Cultural Heritage Unit, European Commission Research
opportunities for local libraries, museums and archives Ian Pigott, principal
administrator, Preservation and Enhancement of Cultural Heritage Unit, European
Commission
12.00 – 12.30 Coffee and tea break
12.30
– 13.00 The Oeiras Manifesto: the
PULMAN agenda for eEurope
Chris Batt,
Director, Libraries & Information Society Team
Resource, The British
Council for Public Libraries Museums and Archives
13.00 – 13.15 Closing
remarks
Jan van
Vaerenbergh, PULMAN co-ordinator and Director of Antwerp Public Libraries
13.15 – 14.30 Conference
lunch
The Oeiras Manifesto
The PULMAN
Agenda for e-Europe
Ministers,
high-level policy makers and practitioners from 36 European countries (1),
agreed the following priorities at the PULMAN policy conference in Oeiras,
Portugal, 13-14 March 2003.
Sufficient funding and support at
national and local level is required:
To achieve these
goals, they must:
·
offer innovative quality services, harnessing digital
technologies, that empower citizens to achieve their personal goals in a
changing world and which contribute to a cohesive society and a successful
knowledge-based economy in Europe.
The PULMAN conference agrees that citizens
will benefit substantially through coherent support for public library, archive
and museum services at local, national and European level in four specific
areas.
Public libraries, working with archives and museums, should:
Democracy
and citizenship
§
Foster a civil, democratic society by serving the needs of the whole community,
provide open access to all cultures and knowledge and combat exclusion by
offering people attractive and enjoyable spaces. The needs of special groups
such as people with disabilities, teenagers, the elderly, the unemployed, and
those living in rural areas should be targeted.
§
Support the take-up of services for e-government, e-health, e-commerce
and e-learning by providing seamless, objective and user-friendly access, as
well as training in the use of electronic resources.
Lifelong learning
Economic and social development
Cultural diversity
Reference documents (click on link):
·
Museums, Intangible Heritage and Globalisation. Shanghai Charter, ICOM
(2002)
·
IFLA Glasgow Declaration on Libraries, Information Services and
Intellectual Freedom (2002)
·
IFLA Internet Manifesto (2002)
·
NAPLE Statement on European Public Libraries in Development (2002)
·
EBLIDA statement on the role of libraries in lifelong learning (2001)
·
Lund Principles: e-Europe, creating cooperation for digitisation, DG
Information Society (2001)
·
Council of Europe/EBLIDA Guidelines on Library Legislation and Policy
in Europe (2000)
·
Council of Europe Recommendation on a European policy on access to
archives (2000)
·
Copenhagen Declaration (1999)
·
Leuven Communiqué (1998)
·
Report on the Role of Libraries in the Modern World of the Committee on
Culture, Youth, Education and the Media of the European Parliament (1998)
·
Museums and Cultural Diversity: Policy Statement, ICOM (1997)
IFLA/UNESCO
Public Library Manifesto (1994)
Footnotes:
(1) The PULMAN network includes the EU member states, candidate states and neighbouring countries: Albania, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia-Montenegro, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine, UK.
(2) http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/index_en.htm
(3) http://www.pulmanweb.org/DGMs/DGMs.htm
THE OEIRAS ACTION PLAN
The PULMAN conference calls upon Ministers, policy makers
and practitioners at national and local level, within a specified timeframe to:
1.
Establish strategies, which
utilise and develop the skills and infrastructure of Europe’s comprehensive
physical network of public libraries, archives and museums in order to develop
their full social, cultural and economic potential.
2.
Identify national and local funding
priorities in support of key activities such as providing access to electronic
resources and the Internet, digitisation, piloting new services, ensuring an
adequate technical infrastructure, including broadband connectivity where
feasible and the adoption of common standards.
3.
Consider the establishment of cross-domain agencies and
inter-ministerial co-operation for co-ordinated
policy making within the cultural heritage sector (public libraries, museums
and archives).
4.
Develop effective partnerships
between the local cultural heritage sector and other key economic and social
sectors (e.g. education, employment, tourism, community organisations, etc) to
facilitate re-engineering of local services, as well as cost-effective
provision and management.
5.
Provide interactive
access to content through state-of-the-art, multimedia digital resources
documenting local history, literature, art, music and community interests,
packaged where appropriate as learning resources.
6.
Support the development of centres
of excellence to stimulate take-up of good practice, where necessary as a
starting point for wider implementation of innovative services.
7.
Implement staff recruitment and
training policies, including adequate salary and conditions, to provide the
capacity and skills to deal effectively with user needs e.g. learning support
and the use of Information Society Technologies.
8.
Monitor the changing needs of users as a part of evidence-based policy development and
investment planning.
9.
Measure and evaluate services on a regular basis,
especially those involving new technologies, and establish benchmark criteria to assess the impact and outcome of investment.
10. Propose research
and take-up activities at national or European level based, where
appropriate, on partnerships with support organisations and private sector
companies including those skilled in information access, content building and digitization.
PULMAN:
what we are finding
Public libraries have a number of advantages gained
through delivering their core services including a detailed knowledge of user requirements,
an unrivalled physical focus through the network of over 40,000 service points
in Europe and their enormous existing usage amounting to some 190 million
registered users in the 36 countries of the PULMAN Network.
The staff of these local institutions have demonstrated in many parts of
Europe that the appropriate skills for the digital era can evolve and be
developed from traditional ways of supporting access to information content.
There is good progress to report from many European countries on the
introduction of digital services, development of an educational role and
learning support and allowing citizens to have hands-on access to IT.
But the picture gained through the work of PULMAN
remains uneven. Continuing disparities exist in standards of service between
countries. Both the institution and its services need faster change and
re-engineering in response to changing user needs. Among the key areas to which
this applies are:
§
Development of national and local strategies, programmes and funding;
§
Cross domain policy making and partnerships;
§
Extent of digitisation of local content;
§
The ease and relative cost of technology integration.
The future agenda for local services will
require attention to be paid to broader local services partnerships to deliver
e-Europe involving public libraries working closely with
§
libraries, museums and archives at local/regional level;
§
schools, children, parents and carers;
§
the voluntary sector/NGOs/ community information and advice;
§
local businesses and economic agencies
(e.g. for cultural tourism).
The usability of ICT-based services also needs to be
addressed if they are to become genuinely popular. This involves attention not
only to methods of service delivery and user interfaces but also to the development
and take-up of much simpler methods to help individuals and organisations to
create digital content.
Among the vital contributions which can be made to the
life of individual people by effective public libraries and local cultural
institutions in contemporary Europe are a sense of localisation and personal
engagement in an increasingly ‘globalised’ environment and an enhancement of
the ability to link up the present and the past.
The agenda for digital public libraries
emerging through PULMAN also seems to require attention being paid to the
following:
§
How can we measure the impact of investment in local cultural services,
for example by co-ordinating benchmarking, performance measurement and
statistics?
§
How can we create a level playing field on which public libraries,
museums and archives can meet and co-operate comfortably?
§
How can technologies be delivered to local institutions at an
affordable cost and so that they are easy to ‘plug-in’, for example as web
services? There is a need for a closer engagement with industry to ensure this
happens.
On the last point, the technologies most
needed by local institutions (viewed from early 2003) appear to include those
which support:
§
highly-automated content creation and digitisation;
§
personalisation of content creation and access;
§
multimedia content creation and delivery;
§
broadband exploitation;
§
seamless interactive access to a wide variety of local resources;
§
wider cross-sectoral interoperability of digital information at local
plus national level.
Feedback
from the PULMAN National Workshops
The 36 PULMAN national workshops held mainly in the
Autumn of 2002 were attended by over 2500 people. In some cases, the event was
organized independently but in others part of a larger national conference or
similar meeting. Participation varied but usually included senor policy makers
from ministries and agencies responsible for public libraries and senior
professionals from local libraries, museums and archives services. Reports on
all the national workshops are available on PULMANWeb.
The content and format of the workshops was
somewhat flexible in response to national conditions, but consisted of a basic
three-point agenda for discussion:
§
the PULMAN Guidelines
§
strategies for public libraries
§
strategies for co-operation between local Libraries, Museums and
Archives
There
was significant variation in the starting point for discussion. In a few
countries, this was the first time there had been a well-attended debate on
public libraries. In several more it was the first national discussion of
co-operation between public libraries, museums and archives. In others, the
event built upon existing perceptions and action plans. One or two looked
forward to joint actions in fields such as cultural tourism.
A
full and detailed analysis of the workshops will be produced by Eblida, but
among the initial conclusions identified are:
The
Guidelines
§
The PULMAN Guidelines were widely praised for their applicability and
usefulness. Some countries, mainly those currently outside the EU, found that
the technical guidelines were future-oriented and provided a checklist for
longer-term consideration, with funding the key problem to be overcome in their
implementation. A current lack – in varying degrees - of trained staff,
Internet connectivity and other technology are also important barriers to
overcome.
§
The instances of good practice linked from the Guidelines were of
especially wide interest and seen by some as essential resource and a ‘control
list’ for the development of services in their country. There has been
widespread interest in adding links to good practice from participants’ own
countries following the workshops: this is visible in the Second Edition of the
Guidelines.
§
A wide dissemination of the First Edition of the Guidelines was
reported. Not only Web but also print and CD-Rom versions of the Guidelines
have been produced and distributed in a majority of the 20+ languages into
which they have been translated. National and regional media interest was
evident at several of the workshops. In
various countries, special action was taken to ensure that the Guidelines and
the resolutions of the workshops reached the appropriate decision makers and
legislators.
§
The impact of the Guidelines has been relatively strong. At least one country has decided to prepare
a strategy for public libraries as a direct result of the stimulus provided by
the Guidelines and the Workshop. Elsewhere, new projects are being devised as a
result. One workshop participant described the DGMs as “The bible of
contemporary librarianship”. Others have established working groups, discussion
lists or set up special training sessions based on individual guideline topics.
Elsewhere, the Guidelines are being incorporated into formal education
programmes. In several cases, the workshops led to a decision to organize
further cross-domain meetings to define models and action plans for
co-operative services.
§
One example, illustrating the immediate effect of the Guidelines could
be seen in the success story of one city library in the Baltic States. Two days after the workshop, the library
manager called the country co-ordinator to say that she had presented the
Guidelines to local politicians immediately after the workshop and - as it
coincided with the negotiations for the budgeting libraries’ activities - a
very favourable decision was made to support the library’s acquisitions
additionally this year.
Public
library strategies
Public libraries have an
important role in developing new and accessible networks after the dissolution
of old style networks in the ‘transition’ countries’ but there is need for
continued recognition of disparities in the ability to keep up with IT change.
The Guidelines will be instrumental in shaping new services and improving
existing services. But basic problems,
such as staffing, buildings and tecnical equipment still need to be solved.
§
It is vital to create government programmes, ensuring government funds
for wide introduction of ICT in public libraries and making efforts to provide
libraries with cheaper access to the Internet.
§
Definition and knowledge-sharing are needed on projects that address
lifelong learning. involving municipal educational departments.
§
Better knowledge of existing social exclusion policies may be needed
among the professional community in some countries.
§
Public libraries should be at the centre of the e-government process.
To accomplish this, they should raise awareness among government officials and
the public. More knowledge of European experience in involvement with
e-government programmes is needed.
§
There is a key role for public libraries to play involving schools,
families and children.
§
For partnerships in support of economic and business sectors, public
libraries need skilled and well-trained personnel and technological equipment
and infrastructure.
§
User needs are paramount.
§
Realistic peformance evaluation is needed in this context.
§
Recruitment and retention of the right personnel, including those with
ICT skills, to public libraries is critical and requires adjustment of their
existing financial and social status in many countries.
Co-operation
between Public Libraries, Museums and Archives
§
Integration of these services into electronic society still needs much
more work in many countries.
§
There is wide agreement on the need for national digitisation
strategies which have a strong local dimension.
§
There is a need to consider setting up local, regional and national
policies in order to incentivise cooperation and co-ordinate development of
local library, museum and archives services, starting at national level and
taking account of emerging examples in some EU countries (e.g. Norway, UK).
§
There is a need for more knowledge on what constitutes good practice in
local cooperation of this kind. The production of education packages may be a
fruitful environment in which to start working on co-operation.
§
Training for co-operation is needed.
§
Much local library, museums and
archive co-operation, where it exists, takes a ‘traditional’ form. There is a
need to initiate joint projects using ICT e.g. by creating a national
cross-domain forum or portal.
§
Local archives and museums are in many countries less well-equipped
than public libraries.
The report on the
Public Library in the Electronic World: a survey initiated by NAPLE (National Authorities of Public Libraries in
Europe) http://www.bs.dk/naple/survey.pdf and published by the Danish National Library
Authority in 2002, has gathered a wealth of interesting information on the
current situation of public libraries in Europe based on returned
questionnaires from 21 countries.
The
Public Libraries in the Information Society (PLIS) study from 1996 analysed the
stage of IT-development in different countries, and found the picture very
uneven with UK and the Nordic countries in the forefront of the development and
southern Europe lagging behind.
Since
then, tremendous changes have occurred in the public library sector with
information technology remaining the driving force. People are being exposed to
a range of new technological challenges and opportunities in the digital age,
which are changing industrial production, service provision, markets, organisational
structures, and professional roles in a fundamental way.
Among its
findings the NAPLE study indicates that:
§
Compared to a few years ago, the development of the public library
scene in Europe overall has been very positive.
§
The public library and its possible contribution to society are
recognized increasingly.
§
The last 10 years have been characterised by legislative action in many
of the countries, especially in countries from the former ‘Soviet bloc’.
§
The public library system is – on the whole – a municipality-based
system in terms of responsibility and funding.
§
A regional support structure can be part of the legislation and
regulations in the individual country but it can also exist without formal
legislation and regulation based on traditional and voluntary co-operation.
§
Many countries have a national public library authority as part of a
Ministry or a more or less independent body referring to a ministry or acting
on its behalf.
§ The involvement of central government in providing strategic leadership and vision varies greatly.

§
National digitisation policies and strategies are a necessary
precondition for a full- scale integration of the public library system into
the electronic world but many countries have not yet started this work.
§ The implementation of Internet access in public libraries is growing very fast.

§
A more important question is whether the users have free access, and
which services the library system provides through the Internet, for example:
catalogue access, requisition access, net guides and question and answering
services.
§
The range and number of national Internet services such as portals,
quality-assessed guides, homepages directed towards specific target groups etc.
is an indicator of the national emphasis on public libraries, national support
and co-operation.

§
The need for competency development and upgrading of librarians’
knowledge in the field of information technology in its widest sense cannot be
overstressed,
Current data from
the respondents to The Public Library in the Electronic World survey

The figures with
an * indicate that the number consists of persons employed. The calculation is
not based on full time equivalents. In both Iceland and Austria, there are many
volunteers.
The NAPLE report
makes a number of trend predictions for the coming 10 years:
§
From collection orientation to orientation towards access to electronic
sources.
§
Reductions in budgets and staff.
§
Accountability will become a vital issue.
§
Focus on alternative forms of financing and income generation.
§
Focus shifting from collection to user.
§
From visitors to distance access to the library.
§
Electronic selection of materials.
§
From the OPAC to virtual catalogues and meta-catalogues and resource
information retrieval systems.
§
From service to users to education of users.
By
Rob Davies
MDR
Partners
PULMAN
Project Manager
Email: rob.davies@mdrpartners.com
A statistical view
This brief overview is produced for the Pulman Policy
Conference. Fuller information can be found on the LIBECON we b site
www.Libecon.org or on the CDRom produced for the Conference.
The LIBECON project collects library statistics and
makes them available via the web to policy makers, practitioners and
researchers free of charge in a standardised format based on ISO2789 [the
international standard for library statistics. Like PULMAN, LIBECON is funded
by DGINFOS under FP5. Its users have access to standardised statistical data to
make comparisons between countries or groups of countries for advocacy or for
management purposes, including international benchmarking. LIBECON does not
undertake primary surveys but takes national data, using the ISO2789 standard,
checks the data for feasibility and follows up queries. If the data is
incomplete, LIBECON seeks to agree a basis for grossing up the data so that it
is complete for that country. If data is missing, LIBECON interpolates from
known years. If a country has no data at all for a sector, an average derived
from a group of comparable countries is interpolated. This interpolation
process allows the big political numbers to be estimated, for example, total
number of library employees in Europe [374,000 in 2000] or total registered
readers [139 million]. This process ensures that the data is authoritative and
internationally comparable. Policy makers and other stakeholders are working to
reduce the limitations imposed by the current state of the art. Increasingly,
we want impact measures [which would answer the question what difference did
public libraries make to people’s lives] and we want to measure the extent of
the new services, especially the electronic services which form an increasingly
significant part of public libraries’ services and demonstrate their
significance to the e-Europe, e-Learning and social inclusion agendas. In both
these areas research and development is under way in Europe and elsewhere but t
h e re are few data which are statistically safe for international comparison.
In the space available we can give some meaningful facts.
Importance
of public libraries
Ta b le 1. [Data is for Europe – EU, Central and Eastern Euro p e and
EFTA] shows that nearly half of all spending on libraries is on public
libraries and that they employ nearly half the to ta l staff employed in
libraries.

Actual spending on public libraries in 2000 was ¤ 6.486
billions
and about 171,000 full time equivalent staff were
employed.
Expenditure
per head of population looks like this:
The
figures are cash. This data is also available on a countryby- country basis and
with other regional summaries. For example, the latest available figure [1998]
for the USA was € 21
and for Japan [1999] €
9.26.

How are public libraries organised and managed?
Public
libraries are normally run by local government units, which we call library
authorities. The size of library authorities in Europe is small. On average,
each library authority serves a population of less than 9,000, employs just 3
public library staff and is responsible for 1.269 libraries. These numbers
raise important policy issues. How are economies of scale to be achieved? How
can public library staff receive continuing training and update their skills?
What support mechanisms are appropriate for smallauthorities? What is the role
of central or regional government bodies? How are high standards to be
achieved? How is an agenda of modernisation best implemented? The following
chart shows significant regional variations. The range is from 2,031 in the
Slovak Republic to more than 286,000 in the UK.

What do public
libraries achieve with the money?
We have referred to the difficulty in measuring
outcomes, but there is no shortage of data on outputs. For a start, there were
about 73,900 public library buildings in Europe in 2000, one building for each
6,700 population. These service points act as community focal points and at
tract users. In 2000 there we re about 119 million registered users [more than
24% of the entire population] who borrowed 2.3 billion [thousand million] items
[more than 4.6 items/head] and made 2.05 billion physical visits to libraries
[more than 4 per head]. As ever, there are large variations between countries
and regions and those who have time should look at the data in more depth.
Public libraries continue to adopt ICT as rapidly as their circumstances allow.
By 2000, there were 132,000 workstations for public use in public libraries in
Europe of which 68,000 were connected to the internet. Both numbers are
increasing very rapidly, as the chart shows. Regional disparities were very
large up to the year 2000, and will probably remain large. Estimates of
percentages of catalogue records automated remain low and the numbers are
increasing only slowly.


What are the major
trends?
At pan-European level, the percentage of registered
users is stable. Numbers of loans and visits are declining slightly, perhaps mirroring
increasing investment in ICT, which allows remote use of services. Regrettably
there are no reliable figures at European level reflecting “virtual” use of
public libraries, though such use is known to be increasing rapidly.

Should we invest more
in public libraries?
As ever, it is important always to take into account local
[national] circumstances when deciding whether to invest and what to invest in.
Common sense would suppose that if you spend more money on public libraries,
you get more and better outputs [and outcomes, if we could measure them]. The
LIBECON data seems to support this view. Given the very marked differences in
levels of spending between countries and regions, there is a strong case for
more spending in many countries. The statistical case can be summarised
briefly. We were looking for a statistical relationship between spending and
outputs. We regard the figures we have for visits, loan transactions and
registered members as good and the activities or outputs described as significant
and important in the co n text of public libra r i e s’ objectives and we
correlated these to spending. On spending we took the LIBECON data for spending
per head and expressed this as a percentage of the World Bank’s gross national
income figure for each country. We then looked to find a correlation by
calculating the correlation coefficients. 3 A selection of the results are
shown on the next page. These results are taken from submissions from a finite
number of countries. They are influenced by a number of external factors and
are reliant on the quality of data provided. Therefore conclusions can only be
drawn on the general trends that emerge.



Conclusion
Statistics
cannot answer every question and they are never
as up
to date as we would like. But LIBECON does begin to allow us to ask and answer
certain questions and to begin to benchmark public libraries inte r n a t i o n
a l ly. If the right questions are asked by the right people and the lessons
are learned, LIBECON provides a strong contribution to the case for developing
and improving Europe’s libraries. factors and are reliant on the quality of
data provided. Therefore conclusions can only be drawn on the general trends
that emerge.
David Fuegi, MDR Partners
david.fuegi@mdrpartners.com
Martin Jennings, Institute for Public Finance
martin.jennings@ipf.co.uk
g
PULMAN Express is a quarterly published newsletter
available in English only. Subscription is free. To subscribe, visit the
PULMANweb server at:
www.pulmanweb.org/news/register
and fill in the on-line form.
PULMAN Express will be also available
on-line on the PULMANweb server at: www.pulmanweb.org/news.
For any questions concerning the
PULMAN project, please contact:
PULMAN Network Coordinator
Jan van
Vaerenbergh, Antwerp City Library
jan.vanvaerenbergh@cs.antwerpen.be
PULMAN Network
Project Manager
Rob Davies
rob.davies@mdrpartners.com
PULMAN Network
Administrator
Mary Gianoli
mary.gianoli@mdrpartners.com
PULMAN Express Newsletter Editor
Veria Central Public Library, Greece
g